Thank you kindly for all the work that you've done on my and my wife's behalf. A big pressure has been taken off our chests

M. Elliot
  1. Article
  2. Related Articles
  3. Related Practice Areas

Taxation Law - Global Transparency: High Net Wealth Individuals, Tax Information Exchange Agreements and Multinationals: Country by Country Reporting - Part 3

Date: January 18, 2010

Authors: Tony Anamourlis B.A., LL.B., MTaxLaw, GradDipLegPrac, SJD Candidate (La Trobe); ATIA

Other articles in this series;

Country by Country Reporting

According to a briefing paper from the Tax Justice Network[1] and to the UK Tax Minister[2] country by country reporting means that Multinational Companies (“MNC”) report in its accounts without exception:

  1. Which countries it operates in;
  2. what name it trades under in each country.

Its financial performance in the countries were it operates including;

  1. Sales, both within the group and outside the group
  2. purchases, split the same way;
  3. financing costs, split the same way;
  4. labour costs and employee numbers;
  5. pre-tax profit; and
  6. tax payments to the government of the location were it is trading.

According to the briefing paper, if implemented in Australia, this will impact on, both Accountants and the clients advisors. This will include, but not limited to;

  1. Country by country reporting will show were a group of companies operate, what name it trades under and what trading it undertakes, both within its own group and with third party suppliers and customers. This would make new information available to a wide range of stakeholder groups.
  2. It would also put on record, where companies are registered and where they operate and it would also indicate whether those companies are cooperating from politically unstable regimes, whether there considered to be tax havens, whether there considered to be operting from war zones and other sensitive areas. It would also assist tax authorities and other enforcement agencies and investors of those jurisdictions to find out who actually owns the company's that are trading in their home countries; and
  3. Whether any tax has been paid and to whom, whether that appears reasonable in relation to the tax rates in the countries in question, and whether the group appears to be using tax havens for profit shifting purposes. The use of tax havens could be highlighted both by the country listing and by data showing that intragroup trading in these places is particularly heavy. The argument here is that significant use of tax havens could trigger into deeper enquiries into whether transfer mispricing is occurring.

Why is Country by Country Reporting so Important for Treasury.

According to a Task Force report[3], amongst for other reasons, country by country reporting is important because;

  1. Country by Country Reporting discloses the profits the companies record in each country in which they operate and the taxes that they pay on them. This means they can be held answerable for what they do and don't pay and it  further strengthens the relevance of having tax information exchange agreements between tax havens. Further, country by country reporting offers useful additional information to tax authorities seeking to appropriately tax multinational corporations. However, according to the author, there is a problem. Murphy observes that almost without exception groups of companies are not taxed anywhere in the world. The individual companies that make up the group are taxed instead. This gives problems however, especially when those companies under common control are located in different jurisdictions with differing tax rules and rates;
  2. Country by country reporting would provide better information than is currently available on the identity and location of the Corporation subsidiary companies in a particular country. In many countries that information is simply not available due to confidentality and or secrecy laws; and
  3. For shareholders, country by country reporting would, allow for the appraisal of governance risks a corporation takes. The argument here is that, almost all major corporate failures in recent times have been dissociated with intragroup trading, complex group structures in tax haven activity. In this respect, country by country reporting would allow and provide a new perspectives on governance risk.


[1] Tax Justice Network. Tax Justice Briefing. Country by Country Reporting: How to Make Multinationals Companies More Transparent. March 2008. pp.4-5

[2] UK tax minister to call for country by country reporting. International Tax Review. 1 June 2009.

[3] Murphy.R., Country by Country Reporting: Holding multinational corporations to account whereever they are. Financial Integrity & Economic Development. June 2009.
  1. Article
  2. Related Articles
  3. Related Practice Areas